In an unexpected clash between mainstream television and new media, what began as criticism from ABC’s “The View” quickly transformed into a viral moment for podcast giant Joe Rogan, demonstrating the evolving landscape of modern media influence.
The controversy ignited when Joy Behar, veteran co-host of “The View,” aimed at Rogan during a heated discussion about young Americans’ news consumption habits. “We went from Walter Cronkite, basically, to this guy Joe Rogan, who believes in dragons,” Behar declared, attempting to discredit the popular podcaster’s credibility.
Rather than responding with anger, Rogan turned the criticism into comedy. He promptly changed his X (formerly Twitter) profile description to “Dragon Believer,” embracing the label with characteristic humor. “That’s my new official X description,” Rogan announced to his millions of followers.
The clash highlighted a deeper divide in modern media. While “The View” hosts emphasized their traditional media credentials, Behar noted, “People like our show because they know ABC News checks us. ” Inadvertently, they demonstrated the very misinformation they were criticizing.
Setting The Record Straight
Rogan’s statements about dragons from his podcast episodes reveal a more nuanced discussion about cultural mythology and extinct species. During conversations with biologist Forrest Galante, Rogan explored theories about how ancient peoples might have encountered large reptilian creatures that inspired dragon myths across different cultures.
“Think of all these different cultures, ancient, medieval Europe, China, Japan, all of them had dragons,” Rogan had explained in his podcast. “It might have been a real thing, and I think most of them didn’t have dragons that could spit fire either; I think that was like a Hollywood movie Godzilla-type deal.”
The Bigger Picture
The incident sparked from a broader discussion on “The View” about a recent poll showing young Americans increasingly getting their news from social media influencers who lean politically correct. Co-host Sara Haines had urged viewers to “triple-check” information before accepting it as truth, ironically setting up Behar’s unverified dragon claims.
Modern Media Dynamics
This exchange perfectly illustrates the changing dynamics of media influence and credibility. While traditional media outlets like “The View” rely on institutional backing and network fact-checking, new media figures like Rogan have built trust through long-form conversations and transparency about their speculations and beliefs.
The incident also showcases different approaches to public discourse. Where “The View” attempted to dismiss Rogan through mockery, he responded by leaning into the criticism with humor, even sharing Biblical passages about the Leviathan and biological descriptions of theoretical dragons, writing, “I want to believe.”
The Aftermath
The controversy has sparked broader discussions about media literacy, fact-checking, and the evolution of public discourse. While “The View” hosts emphasized their traditional media credentials, with Whoopi Goldberg noting they’re “checked by everybody,” the incident demonstrated how quickly misinformation can spread even on mainstream platforms.
Rogan’s response – turning criticism into content and engaging playfully rather than defensively – showcases why many younger viewers are drawn to his communication style. His ability to discuss complex topics while maintaining intellectual humility and a sense of humor starkly contrasts with more rigid traditional media formats.
This media clash is a perfect case study of how modern audiences consume and process information. It highlights the growing divide between traditional broadcast media and the more conversational, nuanced approach of long-form podcasting. As young Americans increasingly turn to alternative sources for news and information, the incident raises important questions about credibility, fact-checking, and the future of public discourse.
Table of Contents